| пали |
english - Nyanamoli thera |
Комментарии |
|
Tatrāyaṃ dīpanā, iddhimā parassa cittaṃ jānitukāmo āvajjati, āvajjanaṃ khaṇapaccuppannaṃ ārammaṇaṃ katvā teneva saha nirujjhati.
|
Here is the illustration. The possessor of supernormal- power who wants to know another’s mind adverts. The adverting [consciousness] makes [the other’s consciousness that is] present by moment its object and ceases together with it.
|
|
|
Tato cattāri pañca vā javanāni.
|
After that there are four or five impulsions,
|
|
|
Yesaṃ pacchimaṃ iddhicittaṃ, sesāni kāmāvacarāni, tesaṃ sabbesampi tadeva niruddhaṃ cittamārammaṇaṃ hoti, na ca tāni nānārammaṇāni honti, addhāvasena paccuppannārammaṇattā.
|
of which the last is the supernormal-power consciousness, the rest being of the sense sphere. That same [other’s] consciousness, which has ceased, is the object of all these too, and so they do not have different objects because they have an object that is “present by extent.”
|
|
|
Ekārammaṇattepi ca iddhicittameva parassa cittaṃ jānāti, na itarāni.
|
And while they have a single object it is only the supernormal-power consciousness that actually knows another’s consciousness, not the others,
|
|
|
Yathā cakkhudvāre cakkhuviññāṇameva rūpaṃ passati, na itarānīti.
|
just as in the eye-door it is only eye-consciousness that actually sees the visible datum, not the others. 119.
|
|
|
Iti idaṃ santatipaccuppannassa ceva addhāpaccuppannassa ca vasena paccuppannārammaṇaṃ hoti.
|
So this has a present object in what is present by continuity and what is present by extent.
|
|
|
Yasmā vā santatipaccuppannampi addhāpaccuppanneyeva patati, tasmā addhāpaccuppannavasenevetaṃ paccuppannārammaṇanti veditabbaṃ.
|
Or since what is present by continuity falls within what is present by extent, it can therefore be understood that it has a present object simply in what is present by extent.
|
|
|
Parassa cittārammaṇattāyeva pana bahiddhārammaṇaṃ hotīti evaṃ cetopariyañāṇassa aṭṭhasu ārammaṇesu pavatti veditabbā.
|
It has an external object because it has only another’s mind as its object. This is how knowledge of penetration of minds should be understood to occur with respect to the eight kinds of objects.
|
|