Что нового Оглавление Поиск Закладки Словарь Вход EN / RU
Адрес: Три корзины (основные тексты) >> Корзина дисциплины (Виная Питака) >> Большой раздел (махавагга) >> 1. Большой раздел >> 6. Pañcavaggiyakathā
номера страниц: никакие PTS VRI Thai Myanmar | примечания: вкл. выкл. | вид для печати: открыть
<< Назад 6. Pañcavaggiyakathā Далее >>
Закладка

[saṃ. ni. 3.59 ādayo] "Rūpaṃ, bhikkhave, anattā. Rūpañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca rūpe – 'evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī'ti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ anattā, tasmā rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati rūpe – 'evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī'ti. Vedanā, anattā. Vedanā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ vedanā ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca vedanāya – 'evaṃ me vedanā hotu, evaṃ me vedanā mā ahosī'ti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, vedanā anattā, tasmā vedanā ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati vedanāya – 'evaṃ me vedanā hotu, evaṃ me vedanā mā ahosī'ti. Saññā, anattā. Saññā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ saññā ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca saññāya – 'evaṃ me saññā hotu, evaṃ me saññā mā ahosī'ti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, saññā anattā, tasmā saññā ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati saññāya – 'evaṃ me saññā hotu, evaṃ me saññā mā ahosī'ti. Saṅkhārā, anattā. Saṅkhārā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissaṃsu, nayidaṃ [nayime (ka.)] saṅkhārā ābādhāya saṃvatteyyuṃ, labbhetha ca saṅkhāresu – 'evaṃ me saṅkhārā hontu, evaṃ me saṅkhārā mā ahesu'nti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, saṅkhārā anattā, tasmā saṅkhārā ābādhāya saṃvattanti, na ca labbhati saṅkhāresu – 'evaṃ me saṅkhārā hontu, evaṃ me saṅkhārā mā ahesu'nti. Viññāṇaṃ, anattā. Viññāṇañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ viññāṇaṃ ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca viññāṇe – 'evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ hotu, evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ mā ahosī'ti. Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, viññāṇaṃ anattā, tasmā viññāṇaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati viññāṇe – 'evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ hotu, evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ mā ahosī'ti.

пали english - Khematto Bhikkhu Комментарии
[saṃ. ni. 3.59 ādayo] "Rūpaṃ, bhikkhave, anattā. “Form, monks, is not self.
Rūpañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca rūpe – 'evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī'ti. “If form were the self, this form would not lend itself to dis-ease. It would be possible (to say) with regard to form, ‘Let my form be thus. Let my form not be thus.’
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, rūpaṃ anattā, tasmā rūpaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati rūpe – 'evaṃ me rūpaṃ hotu, evaṃ me rūpaṃ mā ahosī'ti. “But precisely because form is not self, this form lends itself to dis-ease. And it is not possible (to say) with regard to form, ‘Let my form be thus. Let my form not be thus.’
Vedanā, anattā. “Feeling is not self.
Vedanā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ vedanā ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca vedanāya – 'evaṃ me vedanā hotu, evaṃ me vedanā mā ahosī'ti. “If feeling were the self, feeling would not lend itself to dis-ease. It would be possible (to say) with regard to feeling, ‘Let my feeling be thus. Let my feeling not be thus.’
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, vedanā anattā, tasmā vedanā ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati vedanāya – 'evaṃ me vedanā hotu, evaṃ me vedanā mā ahosī'ti. “But precisely because feeling is not self, feeling lends itself to dis-ease. And it is not possible (to say) with regard to feeling, ‘Let my feeling be thus. Let my feeling not be thus.’
Saññā, anattā. “Perception is not self.
Saññā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ saññā ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca saññāya – 'evaṃ me saññā hotu, evaṃ me saññā mā ahosī'ti. “If perception were the self, perception would not lend itself to dis-ease. It would be possible (to say) with regard to perception, ‘Let my perception be thus. Let my form not be thus.’
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, saññā anattā, tasmā saññā ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati saññāya – 'evaṃ me saññā hotu, evaṃ me saññā mā ahosī'ti. “But precisely because perception is not self, perception lends itself to dis-ease. And it is not possible (to say) with regard to perception, ‘Let my perception be thus. Let my perception not be thus.’
Saṅkhārā, anattā. “Fabrications are not self.
Saṅkhārā ca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissaṃsu, nayidaṃ [nayime (ka.)] saṅkhārā ābādhāya saṃvatteyyuṃ, labbhetha ca saṅkhāresu – 'evaṃ me saṅkhārā hontu, evaṃ me saṅkhārā mā ahesu'nti. “If fabrications were the self, fabrications would not lend themselves to dis-ease. It would be possible (to say) with regard to fabrications, ‘Let my fabrications be thus. Let my fabrications not be thus.’
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, saṅkhārā anattā, tasmā saṅkhārā ābādhāya saṃvattanti, na ca labbhati saṅkhāresu – 'evaṃ me saṅkhārā hontu, evaṃ me saṅkhārā mā ahesu'nti. “But precisely because fabrications are not self, fabrications lend themselves to dis-ease. And it is not possible with regard to fabrications, ‘Let my fabrications be thus. Let my fabrications not be thus.’
Viññāṇaṃ, anattā. “Consciousness is not self.
Viññāṇañca hidaṃ, bhikkhave, attā abhavissa, nayidaṃ viññāṇaṃ ābādhāya saṃvatteyya, labbhetha ca viññāṇe – 'evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ hotu, evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ mā ahosī'ti. “If consciousness were the self, consciousness would not lend itself to dis-ease. It would be possible (to say) with regard to consciousness, ‘Let my consciousness be thus. Let my consciousness not be thus.’
Yasmā ca kho, bhikkhave, viññāṇaṃ anattā, tasmā viññāṇaṃ ābādhāya saṃvattati, na ca labbhati viññāṇe – 'evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ hotu, evaṃ me viññāṇaṃ mā ahosī'ti. “But precisely because consciousness is not self, consciousness lends itself to dis-ease. And it is not possible (to say) with regard to consciousness, ‘Let my consciousness be thus. Let my consciousness not be thus.’