| пали |
english - Nyanamoli thera |
Комментарии |
|
827.Vuṭṭhānabalasamāyogoti vuṭṭhānañceva balasamāyogo ca.
|
44. 2. Emergence and 3. coupling of the powers: the resolution of the compound vuṭṭhānabalasamāyoga is vuṭṭhānañ c’eva bala-samāyogo ca.
|
|
|
Lokiyavipassanā hi nimittārammaṇattā ceva pavattikāraṇassa ca samudayassa asamucchindanato neva nimittā na pavattā vuṭṭhāti.
|
[2. Emergence:] mundane insight induces no emergence either from occurrence [of defilement internally], because it does not cut off originating, which is the act of causing occurrence,12 or from the sign [of formations externally], because it has the sign as object.
|
Comm. NT: 12.
Все комментарии (1)
|
|
Gotrabhuñāṇaṃ samudayassa asamucchindanato pavattā na vuṭṭhāti.
|
Change-of-lineage knowledge does not induce emergence from occurrence [internally] because it does not cut off originating,
|
|
|
Nibbānārammaṇato pana nimittā vuṭṭhātīti ekato vuṭṭhānaṃ hoti.
|
but it does induce emergence from the sign [externally] because it has Nibbāna as its object; so there is emergence from one.
|
|
|
Tenāha "bahiddhāvuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇa"nti (paṭi. ma. mātikā 1.10).
|
Hence it is said, “Understanding of emergence and turning away from the external is knowledge of change-of-lineage” (Paṭis I 66).
|
|
|
Tathā "uppādā vivaṭṭitvā anuppādaṃ pakkhandatīti gotrabhu, pavattā vivaṭṭitvā"ti (paṭi. ma. 1.59) sabbaṃ veditabbaṃ.
|
Likewise the whole passage, “Having turned away from arising, it enters into non-arising, thus it is change-of-lineage. Having turned away from occurrence … (etc.—for elision see Ch. XXI.37) … [Having turned away from the sign of formations externally, it enters into cessation, Nibbāna, thus it is change-of-lineage]” (Paṭis I 67), should be understood here.
|
|
|
Imāni pana cattāripi ñāṇāni animittārammaṇattā nimittato vuṭṭhahanti, samudayassa samucchindanato pavattā vuṭṭhahantīti dubhato vuṭṭhānāni honti.
|
These four kinds of [path] knowledge emerge from the sign because they have the signless as their object, and also from occurrence because they cut off origination. So they emerge from both.
|
|